home | articles | fictions | poetry | images | audio & video | shop | bio | contact

Friday, August 11, 2006

You say "Islamo-fascist", I say "you're an idiot"

fascesYou are a very uncool neo-conservative if you haven't yet thrown around the expression "Islamo-fascist". The term has been test-marketed among the neo-con fan-base for about a year now, and they've been debugging it, running it through its paces like test pilots, practicing their cool and casual use of it like Travis Bickel in front of the mirror. But the official "Islamo-fascist" roll-out - and Steve Jobs would have been proud - took place yesterday, delivered by the world's #1 spokesmodel, G.W. Bush, who went to Yale:
"The recent arrests that our fellow citizens are now learning about are a stark reminder that this nation is at war with Islamic fascists who will use any means to destroy those of us who love freedom, to hurt our nation."
I think that he thinks he's describing an enemy that shares a single religious faith (Islam, which reveres the Old and New Testaments, but believes the Koran is God's final word on the whole shebang), and subscribes to a very specific political ideology (fascism, which was conjured in pre-WWII Europe by Benito Mussolini - and also rested comfortably on the shoulders of the Spanish and German governments of the time).

We all know what Islam is. It is a religion of hatred and xenophobia, fear and fundamentalism, that treats women poorly and is intolerant of dissent, right?.

But fascism - well, that expression gets thrown around a lot by extremists of all extremes. I think it's important to be precise when you're at war. Not that I've ever fought in a war. So really I'm only guessing. But I can't help but think it's a bad idea to get fuzzy-headed when you're spending billions of dollars and handling tons of very sophisticated and very dangerous technology.

So let's examine:

Here is how Benito Mussolini, first fascist leader of Italy - in fact, first fascist leader in the world - describes his political creed in "The Political and Social Doctrine of Fascism":
"Granted that the 19th century was the century of socialism, liberalism, democracy, this does not mean that the 20th century must also be the century of socialism, liberalism, democracy. Political doctrines pass; nations remain. We are free to believe that this is the century of authority, a century tending to the 'right', a Fascist century. If the 19th century was the century of the individual (liberalism implies individualism) we are free to believe that this is the 'collective' century, and therefore the century of the State."

Well, he should know.

Another take on fascism, with more pizzazz - but written by someone who was not himself a fascist (and so he may not know what he's talking about) is Italian scholar/novelist Umberto Eco's famous essay: "Fourteen Ways of Looking At A Blackshirt", published in the "New York Review of Books" in 1995.

In its entirety:
'In spite of some fuzziness regarding the difference between various historical forms of fascism, I think it is possible to outline a list of features that are typical of what I would like to call Ur-Fascism, or Eternal Fascism. These features cannot be organized into a system; many of them contradict each other, and are also typical of other kinds of despotism or fanaticism. But it is enough that one of them be present to allow fascism to coagulate around it.

* * *

1. The first feature of Ur-Fascism is the cult of tradition.

Traditionalism is of course much older than fascism. Not only was it typical of counterrevolutionary Catholic thought after the French revolution, but is was born in the late Hellenistic era, as a reaction to classical Greek rationalism. In the Mediterranean basin, people of different religions (most of the faiths indulgently accepted by the Roman pantheon) started dreaming of a revelation received at the dawn of human history. This revelation, according to the traditionalist mystique, had remained for a long time concealed under the veil of forgotten languages -- in Egyptian hieroglyphs, in the Celtic runes, in the scrolls of the little-known religions of Asia.

This new culture had to be syncretistic. Syncretism is not only, as the dictionary says, "the combination of different forms of belief or practice;" such a combination must tolerate contradictions. Each of the original messages contains a sliver of wisdom, and although they seem to say different or incompatible things, they all are nevertheless alluding, allegorically, to the same primeval truth.

As a consequence, there can be no advancement of learning. Truth already has been spelled out once and for all, and we can only keep interpreting its obscure message.

If you browse in the shelves that, in American bookstores, are labeled New Age, you can find there even Saint Augustine, who, as far as I know, was not a fascist. But combining Saint Augustine and Stonehenge -- that is a symptom of Ur-Fascism.

2. Traditionalism implies the rejection of modernism.

Both Fascists and Nazis worshipped technology, while traditionalist thinkers usually reject it as a negation of traditional spiritual values. However, even though Nazism was proud of its industrial achievements, its praise of modernism was only the surface of an ideology based upon blood and earth (Blut und Boden). The rejection of the modern world was disguised as a rebuttal of the capitalistic way of life. The Enlightenment, the Age of Reason, is seen as the beginning of modern depravity. In this sense Ur-Fascism can be defined as irrationalism.

3. Irrationalism also depends on the cult of action for action's sake.

Action being beautiful in itself, it must be taken before, or without, reflection. Thinking is a form of emasculation. Therefore culture is suspect insofar as it is identified with critical attitudes. Distrust of the intellectual world has always been a symptom of Ur-Fascism, from Hermann Goering's fondness for a phrase from a Hanns Johst play ("When I hear the word 'culture' I reach for my gun") to the frequent use of such expressions as "degenerate intellectuals," "eggheads," "effete snobs," and "universities are nests of reds." The official Fascist intellectuals were mainly engaged in attacking modern culture and the liberal intelligentsia for having betrayed traditional values.

4. The critical spirit makes distinctions, and to distinguish is a sign of modernism.

In modern culture the scientific community praises disagreement as a way to improve knowledge. For Ur-Fascism, disagreement is treason.

5. Besides, disagreement is a sign of diversity.

Ur-Fascism grows up and seeks consensus by exploiting and exacerbating the natural fear of difference. The first appeal of a fascist or prematurely fascist movement is an appeal against the intruders. Thus Ur-Fascism is racist by definition.

6. Ur-Fascism derives from individual or social frustration.

That is why one of the most typical features of the historical fascism was the appeal to a frustrated middle class, a class suffering from an economic crisis or feelings of political humiliation, and frightened by the pressure of lower social groups. In our time, when the old "proletarians" are becoming petty bourgeois (and the lumpen are largely excluded from the political scene), the fascism of tomorrow will find its audience in this new majority.

7. To people who feel deprived of a clear social identity, Ur-Fascism says that their only privilege is the most common one, to be born in the same country.

This is the origin of nationalism. Besides, the only ones who can provide an identity to the nation are its enemies. Thus at the root of the Ur-Fascist psychology there is the obsession with a plot, possibly an international one. The followers must feel besieged. The easiest way to solve the plot is the appeal to xenophobia. But the plot must also come from the inside: Jews are usually the best target because they have the advantage of being at the same time inside and outside. In the United States, a prominent instance of the plot obsession is to be found in Pat Robertson's The New World Order, but, as we have recently seen, there are many others.

8. The followers must feel humiliated by the ostentatious wealth and force of their enemies.

When I was a boy I was taught to think of Englishmen as the five-meal people. They ate more frequently than the poor but sober Italians. Jews are rich and help each other through a secret web of mutual assistance. However, the followers of Ur-Fascism must also be convinced that they can overwhelm the enemies. Thus, by a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak. Fascist governments are condemned to lose wars because they are constitutionally incapable of objectively evaluating the force of the enemy.

9. For Ur-Fascism there is no struggle for life but, rather, life is lived for struggle.

Thus pacifism is trafficking with the enemy. It is bad because life is permanent warfare. This, however, brings about an Armageddon complex. Since enemies have to be defeated, there must be a final battle, after which the movement will have control of the world. But such "final solutions" implies a further era of peace, a Golden Age, which contradicts the principle of permanent war. No fascist leader has ever succeeded in solving this predicament.

10. Elitism is a typical aspect of any reactionary ideology, insofar as it is fundamentally aristocratic, and aristocratic and militaristic elitism cruelly implies contempt for the weak.

Ur-Fascism can only advocate a popular elitism. Every citizen belongs to the best people in the world, the members or the party are the best among the citizens, every citizen can (or ought to) become a member of the party. But there cannot be patricians without plebeians. In fact, the Leader, knowing that his power was not delegated to him democratically but was conquered by force, also knows that his force is based upon the weakness of the masses; they are so weak as to need and deserve a ruler.

11. In such a perspective everybody is educated to become a hero.

In every mythology the hero is an exceptional being, but in Ur-Fascist ideology heroism is the norm. This cult of heroism is strictly linked with the cult of death. It is not by chance that a motto of the Spanish Falangists was Viva la Muerte ("Long Live Death!"). In nonfascist societies, the lay public is told that death is unpleasant but must be faced with dignity; believers are told that it is the painful way to reach a supernatural happiness. By contrast, the Ur-Fascist hero craves heroic death, advertised as the best reward for a heroic life. The Ur-Fascist hero is impatient to die. In his impatience, he more frequently sends other people to death.

12. Since both permanent war and heroism are difficult games to play, the Ur-Fascist transfers his will to power to sexual matters.

This is the origin of machismo (which implies both disdain for women and intolerance and condemnation of nonstandard sexual habits, from chastity to homosexuality). Since even sex is a difficult game to play, the Ur-Fascist hero tends to play with weapons -- doing so becomes an ersatz phallic exercise.

13. Ur-Fascism is based upon a selective populism, a qualitative populism, one might say.

In a democracy, the citizens have individual rights, but the citizens in their entirety have a political impact only from a quantitative point of view -- one follows the decisions of the majority. For Ur-Fascism, however, individuals as individuals have no rights, and the People is conceived as a quality, a monolithic entity expressing the Common Will. Since no large quantity of human beings can have a common will, the Leader pretends to be their interpreter. Having lost their power of delegation, citizens do not act; they are only called on to play the role of the People. Thus the People is only a theatrical fiction. There is in our future a TV or Internet populism, in which the emotional response of a selected group of citizens can be presented and accepted as the Voice of the People.

Because of its qualitative populism, Ur-Fascism must be against "rotten" parliamentary governments. Wherever a politician casts doubt on the legitimacy of a parliament because it no longer represents the Voice of the People, we can smell Ur-Fascism.

14. Ur-Fascism speaks Newspeak.

Newspeak was invented by Orwell, in Nineteen Eighty-Four, as the official language of what he called Ingsoc, English Socialism. But elements of Ur-Fascism are common to different forms of dictatorship. All the Nazi or Fascist schoolbooks made use of an impoverished vocabulary, and an elementary syntax, in order to limit the instruments for complex and critical reasoning. But we must be ready to identify other kinds of Newspeak, even if they take the apparently innocent form of a popular talk show.

* * *

Ur-Fascism is still around us, sometimes in plainclothes. It would be so much easier for us if there appeared on the world scene somebody saying, "I want to reopen Auschwitz, I want the Blackshirts to parade again in the Italian squares." Life is not that simple. Ur-Fascism can come back under the most innocent of disguises. Our duty is to uncover it and to point our finger at any of its new instances — every day, in every part of the world. Franklin Roosevelt's words of November 4, 1938, are worth recalling: "If American democracy ceases to move forward as a living force, seeking day and night by peaceful means to better the lot of our citizens, fascism will grow in strength in our land." Freedom and liberation are an unending task.'

Here are other quotes about fascism, which I found by using careful researching methods, including very sophisticated information data technology queries employing a new top-secret system:

"Fascism, at any rate the German version, is a form of capitalism that borrows from Socialism just such features as will make it efficient for war purposes. Internally, Germany has a good deal in common with a Socialist state."


"Fascism was really the basis for the New Deal. It was Mussolini's success in Italy, with his government-directed economy, that led the early New Dealers to say 'But Mussolini keeps the trains running on time.'"

- President Ronald Reagan

"The more there are riots the more repressive action will take place and the more we face the danger of a right-wing takeover and eventually a fascist society."

- Martin Luther King, Jr.

"Fascism is capitalism plus murder."

-Upton Sinclair

"Fascism is capitalism in decay."

- Vladimir Lenin

"When fascism comes to America, it will come wrapped in an American flag."

- Senator Huey Long

And my personal favorite:
"Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play."

- Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Propaganda Minister

| More

5 Comments:

The great Dr. Michael Savage claims to have coined the phrase 10 years ago. These dipshits are all listening to the same radio shows.

- By Anonymous Anonymous, at Fri Aug 11, 11:16:00 PM GMT+1  

Thank you for your comment. Look like you have a good blog. I will add it to my favorite.

- By Blogger A K, at Sat Aug 12, 01:41:00 AM GMT+1  

I'm not sure I know Dr. Michael Savage. An advertising man?

- By Blogger Neal Romanek, at Mon Aug 14, 10:05:00 PM GMT+1  

I agree with everything you say here except the statement that "We all know what Islam is. It is a religion of hatred and xenophobia, fear and fundamentalism, that treats women poorly and is intolerant of dissent." I have read and studied the Qur'an and can tell you that at least as taught by the Prophet Muhammad, that is not the case. In fact, as revealed in the Qur'an, Islam is just the opposite.

What we have are fundamentalist and extremist parties, leaders, organizations and states claiming to be Muslim who are not, who have built up an idolatrous religion and usurped Islam's name for God -- just as we have at least one major country I can think of, parties, leaders and organizations within it that think nothing about invading other countries at the cost of thousands upon thousands of lives, who have built up their own idolatrous religion and usurped the name of the Prince of Peace.

- By Blogger Bob Arconti, at Mon Aug 14, 10:53:00 PM GMT+1  

Roger that, Bob.

I was being ironic in my description of Islam. The funny - or maybe not so funny - part is that such an assessment of Islam rarely shouts "I am a raving looney!" as loudly as it should. I would hope that when people read that paragraph, they would think "What a nut!" Alas, I fear too many would think: "I disagree with everything in this article but that part about is Islam."

- By Blogger Neal Romanek, at Tue Aug 15, 03:27:00 AM GMT+1  

Your Comment?